Artx290

A look into art that inspires me, provokes me, and relates to themes of gender and sexuality.
~ Friday, March 9 ~
Permalink

Tracey Emin and the Problem with Sex

“Being an artist isn’t just about making nice things, or people patting you on the back; it’s some kind of communication, a message.”

            -Emin



So much of the later half of this class has discussed issues of HIV/AIDS, safe sex, good sex, bad sex, sex positivism and sex negativism. Unfortunately, however, with all of these various discussions I don’t think anybody ever reached a point where we could truly understand the complexities of each issue. 

I was incredibly struck but Doyle’s definitions and explanations of bad sex and how it may or may not be present in most peoples lives. In understanding better the complexities of the class I would like to think that there is a greater level of introspection happening for each person. We, as a sex negative society have been programmed to believe that good sex is specifically one type of thing and bad sex is so many other things and if one derives enjoyment out of ‘bad sex’ then, perhaps, we are being judged by our society. 


And I am also interested in the intersecting questions of feminism and its relationship to bad sex. What about notable women like Catharine MacKinnon who say that all heterosexual sex is rape? Is she thus saying that bad sex has no positive qualities. What is she then saying about the women who derive pleasure from these experiences? 

I guess I am left with more questions than I am able to answer well. Clearly I need to be thinking more about these issues too. 




Permalink

queenweiner-looks:

These.

I think these images really highlight the disturbing reality that many people don’t know what to say when talking to people who may be ‘different’ and in trying to understand they instead degrade through their questions. 

(Source: knowhomo)


7,266 notes
reblogged via queenfancycat
Permalink
I love what this kid does here. 

I love what this kid does here. 

(Source: thegreatnessideserve)


161 notes
reblogged via queenfancycat
Permalink
queenweiner-looks:

T H I S

I think we discussed this in brief at the beginning of class but I thought this image was a great way to clarify how people look at gender. Or rather, take this chart to understand what gender isn’t. 

queenweiner-looks:

T H I S

I think we discussed this in brief at the beginning of class but I thought this image was a great way to clarify how people look at gender. Or rather, take this chart to understand what gender isn’t. 

(Source: fyeahgenderqueers)


6,716 notes
reblogged via queenfancycat
~ Sunday, March 4 ~
Permalink
I think this is such a relevant quotation when applied to today’s issue of women’s reproductive rights in the media. I think it is clear that there is a strong political divide being created and stoked through poor media representation and there seems to be a discourse on women whereby the ‘news’ is quickly devolving into a sphere where women who are fighting for their rights and being diminished to “overly sensitive” or “too aggressive” in their retaliation. While the people creating this divide are seen as less hateful because of their religious or moral convictions guiding their beliefs. 

I wish I could say this more cogently but I am still in the process of digesting everything and trying to make sense without immediately becoming “too aggressive” in my attacks on the media. 

I think this is such a relevant quotation when applied to today’s issue of women’s reproductive rights in the media. I think it is clear that there is a strong political divide being created and stoked through poor media representation and there seems to be a discourse on women whereby the ‘news’ is quickly devolving into a sphere where women who are fighting for their rights and being diminished to “overly sensitive” or “too aggressive” in their retaliation. While the people creating this divide are seen as less hateful because of their religious or moral convictions guiding their beliefs. 

I wish I could say this more cogently but I am still in the process of digesting everything and trying to make sense without immediately becoming “too aggressive” in my attacks on the media. 

(Source: thesemonstersarereal)


30 notes
reblogged via enfantdelunivers
~ Saturday, March 3 ~
Permalink
55 notes
reblogged via queenfancycat
Permalink

Cloud Nine at Kalamazoo College

When I headed off to see Cloud Nine with a classmate and friend I was really only equipped with some vague definitions and descriptions of the event. More than helpful they were fairly elusive, “Uproariously funny” or “Some weird time fracture thing” didn’t give me much to go on and having attended one or two bad plays in the past I wasn’t terribly optimistic about the outcome of this performance either. However, I could not have been more mistaken and pleasantly surprised by the final bow. Incorporating politics, satire and gender confusion into a play made for a fantastic show. 

Rather than outline the entire performance I will quickly summarize the events from the two acts. In the first act, set in colonial 1880’s africa, the events of a few weeks among a small british family’s life are performed. The family comes standard with a Husband, Clive, a wife, Betty, a son, Edward, a daughter, Victoria, a mother-in-law, Maude, a governess for the children, Ellen, a black servant, Joshua, a visiting friend, Harry, and a neighboring widow, Mrs. Saunders. However, some of these characters were not ‘typical’. For example, Betty was played by a man, Joshua was played by a white male, Victoria was played by a doll, and Edward was played by a female. 

This first act of the play showed the sexual nature of each character and how they tried to maintain their poise and civility in the animalistic nature of Africa. Betty admits her love for the traveller, Harry, who during his frequent visits has molested her son Edward. When Harry tells Clive he is gay Clive pushes him to forget this and to marry a woman. Opportunity for marriage arrises when Ellen admits she is in love with Betty and a wedding occurs between the two gay characters. Before this wedding, Harry also sleeps with the servant Joshua. Clive and the widow engage in a sexual relationship. Finally, Edward plays with his sisters toys and is constantly scolded for his feminine personality. 

While there is far too much to discuss within this act I was particularly struck by the language used by the characters. I found the word-choice to be absolutely crucial in portraying the message of repression during this period. Betty and Clive are most interesting while interacting with each other and the other characters. They seem to most embody this image of repressed sexuality during colonialism. Clive pushes his wife to be patient and doting and seems to find her dull and stupid and he is wildly attracted to Mrs. Saunders who he blames for his interest. Plenty of language refers to the Queen of England and reflecting the nation well. 

The second act I will leave to wikipedia to explain the cast of characters and a quick plot overview: 

  • Betty, now played by a woman (normally the same actress who plays Edward)
  • Edward, her son, now played by a man (normally the same actor who plays Betty)
  • Victoria, her daughter (normally played by the same actress who plays Maud)
  • Martin, Victoria’s husband (normally played by the same actor who plays Harry)
  • Lin, a lesbian single mother (normally played by the same actress who plays Ellen/Mrs. Saunders)
  • Cathy, Lin’s daughter age 5, played by a man (normally the same actor who plays Clive)
  • Gerry, Edward’s lover (normally played by the same actor who plays Joshua

Although Act 2 is set in 1979, some of the characters of Act 1 are reappearing – for them only 25 years have passed. Betty has left Clive, her daughter Victoria is now married to Martin, and Edward has an openly gay relationship with Gerry. Victoria leaves Martin and starts a lesbian relationship with Lin. When Gerry leaves Edward, Edward moves in with his sister and Lin. The three of them have a drunken ceremony in which they call up the Goddess, and after that characters from Act 1 begin appearing in Act 2. Act 2 has a looser structure than Act 1, and Churchill played around with the ordering of the scenes. 

As evidenced by the above information it should be obvious that this act starts by confusing the audience and it took a few minutes and for some members a few scenes to understand who the characters were and what the plot of the act was. This act of the play also provokes the audience to interrogate their perceptions of culture in the 1980’s. Here the women and gay characters dominate the play rather than the men or heterosexual characters. The women control their sexuality and their bodies and their expressions of desire where in act one this was all controlled by the men. 

While there is still plenty more to be digested and discussed about this play I will end by quickly examining the final scene of this play. Betty begins by discussing her sexuality while she was with her husband, clive, and how she felt it was inappropriate to touch herself and then continues in her monologue about her experiences, or lack thereof, with masturbation and her most recent exploration of her own body. As she talks about touching herself and reclaiming her body the actor playing betty from the first act emerges on stage wearing the full costume and approaches Betty. The two pause for a moment, their eyes meet, they embrace, and then walk off stage together. This moment, is the reconciliation of the repression of the Victorian age which defined gender roles so harshly and the liberation of the 80’s when these gender roles and behaviors began to be broken down. 


~ Tuesday, February 28 ~
Permalink
whydoihaveablog:

coketalk:

This may be a campaign about HIV/AIDS awareness, but that’s no excuse. This is blatant misogyny, really sinister stuff that conveys a much more profound message about the female body.
Take another look at it. She’s got a killer smile, but still, you can’t see her eyes. The model is cropped so that she’s essentially headless. What makes her human is gone. What makes her a woman is on display. That’s a very deliberate creative choice.
She is an object to be fucked without a brain or an identity. Worse still, her vagina is a fully indexed destination on a Google map. The visual metaphor is so potent (and porn is so ubiquitous) that this image is more jarring than one in which she shows us her actual pussy.
It’s not about the fact that she’s had sex with Bill Johnson and 19 others. Who gives a fuck? What’s toxic is the idea that they checked into her vagina on Foursquare. It’s saying is that a her private parts aren’t private at all. They’re public. That’s the implicit message in this image, and it’s degrading as hell.
It’s not slut-shaming so much as it’s female-shaming, and it reinforces the age-old cultural narrative that women’s bodies aren’t their own.

Coketalk continues to get it right.

whydoihaveablog:

coketalk:

This may be a campaign about HIV/AIDS awareness, but that’s no excuse. This is blatant misogyny, really sinister stuff that conveys a much more profound message about the female body.

Take another look at it. She’s got a killer smile, but still, you can’t see her eyes. The model is cropped so that she’s essentially headless. What makes her human is gone. What makes her a woman is on display. That’s a very deliberate creative choice.

She is an object to be fucked without a brain or an identity. Worse still, her vagina is a fully indexed destination on a Google map. The visual metaphor is so potent (and porn is so ubiquitous) that this image is more jarring than one in which she shows us her actual pussy.

It’s not about the fact that she’s had sex with Bill Johnson and 19 others. Who gives a fuck? What’s toxic is the idea that they checked into her vagina on Foursquare. It’s saying is that a her private parts aren’t private at all. They’re public. That’s the implicit message in this image, and it’s degrading as hell.

It’s not slut-shaming so much as it’s female-shaming, and it reinforces the age-old cultural narrative that women’s bodies aren’t their own.

Coketalk continues to get it right.


6,604 notes
reblogged via cprowe
~ Monday, February 20 ~
Permalink
vulvapower:

damnitdisney:

fyeahqueervintage:

(via quam-nos-animadverto)



Again, this image is more interesting to me because the male juxtaposes make up with his military uniform and lingerie underneath. 

vulvapower:

damnitdisney:

fyeahqueervintage:

(via quam-nos-animadverto)

Again, this image is more interesting to me because the male juxtaposes make up with his military uniform and lingerie underneath. 


1,831 notes
reblogged via queenfancycat
Permalink

Kanye West- Monster

This video has been discussed at length in the media and I don’t have a lot to say that is concrete in my mind but I find it discomforting that an artist with so much influence in the media uses women as objects so blatantly in this video. For those of you who haven’t seen it yet I would recommend watching it. Be warned though, it is disturbing.